Does the majority have the right to take rights?
SAN FRANCISCO -- A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals began hearing arguments on the constitutionality of Prop 8, the voter-approved California initiative outlawing gay marriage.
Proponents of Prop 8 are seeking to overturn a ruling by Federal Judge Vaughn Walker that held that the initiative is invalid under the federal constitution. In Judge Walker's opinion, it violates the equal protection clause. Proponents say that the people, those who voted to pass the initiative, should not have their will tossed aside by one "activist judge."
No matter how the panel rules, this issue can conceivably continue for another year and a half, as the losing party will have the option of appealing to the full 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court.
Question of the Day: Should the majority by initiative have the right to take rights away from the minority by referendum?
- Frigid temperatures continue in the Bay Area
- 18 LA sheriff's deputies face criminal charges
- Judge to determine if Oikos shooter fit to stand trial
- Gay partner benefits growing at Fortune 500 firms
- South Africa names speakers for Mandela ceremony
- Shooting victim found near school in Vallejo
- Palo Alto man says he was well-fed in North Korea
- NTSB to highlight 'over-reliance' during Asiana hearings
- Facebook considers adding "sympathize" button
- Winter Spare the Air called through Tuesday
- Photos: Record low temperatures freeze the Bay Area
- abcnews: Newlyweds accused in thrill-kill murder
- roundup: Rising tides; Teen shot in SF 57 min ago
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Monday
Most Viewed StoriesMost Viewed Photos