Airlines risk losing business travelers to new rules
SAN JOSE, CA (KGO) -- As federal authorities scramble to tighten airport security, airlines may be facing collateral damage if new procedures or new technology create longer delays. The airlines may lose business travelers, who are considered their bread-and-butter customers.
Business travelers have always been the airlines' best customers. They fly frequently and they pay higher fares because they seldom can book early. Tighter security could chase away those lucrative passengers.
"What the business traveler doesn't want to have to do is spend three hours at the airport to take a one-hour flight," says Forrester Research V.P. Henry Harteveldt.
Technology is making it easier for business travelers to skip the airport. San Jose's Cisco has seen rapid growth in video conferencing. Over 500 companies are regular customers and the service is available in 200 cities in 45 countries.
A new study by Forrester Research indicates 46 percent of business travelers used conference calling this past year, 17 percent did video conferencing, and here's what will have airlines worried -- 40 percent expect to be encouraged or required to do voice or video conferencing next year instead of flying to a meeting.
Harteveldt is the principal analyst for the airline and travel industries at Forrester Research. While technology is a long-term threat to airlines, tighter security could be a short-term issue.
"We saw post 9/11 business travelers and, for that matter leisure travelers too, learned how to adapt to what we called then the new normal. As we're in, what is this now, the new-new-new-new normal, people I think already are adopting," says Harteveldt.
The airlines and the nation's airports will be expected to live with whatever tighter measures the transportation security administration decides to implement.
"It's pretty much whatever they decide has to be imposed," says Mineta San Jose International Airport spokeswoman, Vicki Day. When asked if she had much say in the matter, she replied, "Not really, no."
One of the key questions still to be resolved is who exactly is going to pay for all the added security, especially the scanning machines that cost upwards of $170,000 each?
And the loss of privacy a full-body scan entails.
"If that's going to keep us safe, so be it," says traveler Diana Mallman.
terrorism, transportation, san jose, business, david louie
- Man ID'd in fatal boating accident in Redwood City
- Cal/OSHA fines BART $210,000 in 2013 fatal accident
- Evacuation came too late for many on sinking ferry
- Death penalty sought in killing of girl at sleepover
- Crews retrieving body that washed onto Lands End 31 min ago
- Nobel laureate Gabriel Garcia Marquez dies at 87 39 min ago
- Infant boy left alone in car all day in San Jose dies
- Two injured in accident on Almaden Expressway
- Chelsea Clinton expecting first child 13 min ago
- Military shell prompted evacuation of hundreds 53 min ago
- Water supply flushed after teen urinates into reservoir
- Mi Pueblo grocery stores submit bankruptcy plans
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Thursday
- roundup: SF plastic bag ban; Boy killed in Antioch