- Report a typo
-
SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 19, 2007 (KGO) (KGO) -- Comcast is getting plenty of criticism after two separate studies found evidence the Internet giant is interfering with computers involved in peer-to-peer file sharing.
The Associated Press did one study, and the Internet watchdog Electronic Frontier Foundation did the other.
Comcast denies it all. Matthew Elvey of San Francisco used to be a happy Comcast customer. He might still be, if not for a common problem that happened a lot more than once. "I was downloading a movie from an author that I liked, and it wasn't working," said Elvey. According to investigations by the Associated Press and San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation, the difficulties may have been intentional. Both agencies now accuse Internet giant Comcast of interfering with, or delaying, uploads of movies, music, and other content from file sharing networks. "The most common belief about this is they think file share users are using up too much of their network capacity," said Seth Shoen, Electronic Frontier Foundation. At the center of this is a concept called net neutrality. It's the premise that Internet service providers should serve as a conduit, nothing more, like the post office or the telephone company. According to this study, Comcast has been interfering. "You know when you're making a telephone call, the phone company doesn't pop up in the middle of the call and start advertising to you or say 'we think you made too many calls today, so we're going to start adding some noise to your conversation," said Shoen. "What they're saying now is, well, you can't do things we don't like. Or that people have convinced us to not let you do," said Elvey. Comcast denies the accusations. According to a spokesman, "Comcast does not block access to any websites or online applications, including peer-to-peer services...we have a responsibility to provide all of our customers with a good Internet experience." "People have been concerned about the precedent of Internet service providers changing their role," said Shoen. The concern is a change in policy might alter the Internet landscape in terms of security, anonymity, and accountability to big brother. The next step is possibly a class action lawsuit. Matthew Elvey says he is thinking seriously about it.(Copyright ©2009 KGO-TV/DT. All Rights Reserved.)
- Report a typo
-
Sponsored Content
Advertisement
- Packers beat 49ers at Lambeau Field, 30-24
- Jackson, Swift face off at American Music Awards
- abcnews: 9/11 defendants plan to plead not guilty
- Iran begins war games to protect nuclear sites
- Fatal plane crash near Watsonville investigated
- Six arrested after beating at Sequoia High School
- Assault on 12-year-old may be tied to Facebook
- Stabbed SF muralist returns to work
- `New Moon' wolfs down $140.7M in opening weekend
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Monday
-
Most Popular
-
Most Viewed StoriesMost Viewed VideoMost Viewed Photos
Advertisement
ABC7 Everywhere
Wireless
Breaking news as it happens. Sign up now!
Visit our mobile site at abc7newstogo.com.
Get our iPhone application.
Newsletters, Alerts, and RSS
Sign up for our newsletters to get news, weather and other alerts via email.
Get breaking news alerts on your desktop
With our RSS feeds, get real-time updates of abc7news.com using your favorite news reader.
Contests, Promotions, and Registration
Check out our contests and promotions. There are always great opportunities to win!
Become a member to enter contests, comment on stories, receive newsletters, and more!
Advertisement
- abc7news.com home
- Site Map
- RSS
- Advertise with Us
- Contact Us
- DTV Reports
- Technical Help
- ABC.com
- ABCNews.com
- Privacy Policy
- Safety Information for this site
- Terms of Use
- Copyright ©2009 ABC Inc., KGO-TV/DT San Francisco, CA. All Rights Reserved.





