San Francisco News
Justices hear Proposition 8 arguments
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) -- The battle over same-sex marriage lands in the California Supreme Court. The high court will decide if Proposition 8, which bans gay marriage, is constitutional.
Proposition 8 was narrowly passed by state voters in November, amending the California Constitution to ban same-sex marriage.
It's a legal question profoundly important in California, but being watched all over the country very closely as well.
The justices entered the courtroom and wasted no time getting to the heart of the issue.
"Would you explain to the court why that is a revision to the constitution rather than a mere amendment?" said Justice Kathryn Werdegar from the California Supreme Court.
Opponents of Prop 8 contend it revised the constitution, something only state lawmakers or a constitutional convention can do. They argue voters cannot take away the rights this same court granted last may allowing same sex couples to marry.
"An amendment has to be consistent, a measure that is consistent with the existing purposes, principles and structure of our constitution. A revision is a measure that substantially changes the existing purposes," said Shannon Minter from the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Justice Joyce Kennard sharply questioned limits on the power of the people.
"The people are those who created the constitution. I think what you're overlooking is the very broad power of the people to amend by initiative the constitution," said Justice Kennard.
Outside the court, the debate was even more spirited, as hundreds on both sides demonstrated, including same-sex couples who legally wed before Prop 8. The court is considering what happens to those marriages.
"Is it really fair to the people who depended on what this court said was the law, is it really fair to throw that out," said Justice Ming Chin from the California Supreme Court.
Kenneth Starr, known most notably for his investigation of former president Bill Clinton, argued for banning gay marriage.
"I don't believe Prop 8 and we've submitted this, 'invalidates,' but it does deny recognition," said Starr.
"Almost certainly the 18,000 marriages from before are safe. Nobody was interested in the retroactivity argument," said ABC7 legal analyst Dean Johnson.
Johnson thinks Prop 8 may be overturned by what he calls a 'shaky four-three majority.' We will know for sure in about 90 days.
san francisco news, carolyn tyler
- 1 dead, 2 injured in Redwood City boating accident
- Mother, child killed in San Francisco fire
- San Francisco officials plan to crack down on "420"
- SF Chinese community faces fallout from Yee arrest
- Serious accident on Almaden Expressway in San Jose 57 min ago
- Possible explosive prompts evacuations in Solvang
- Firetruck rams California eatery; 15 injured
- BART unveils new train car design in SF
- Man accused of killing Sierra LaMar appears in court
- VIDEO: Man kicked in head taking selfie in...
- Angels beat A's 5-4 on Iannetta's HR in 12th
- Photos: The 10 worst jobs for 2014
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Thursday
- roundup: Hammer beating; SF "420" crackdown 35 min ago
- Bay Area weather forecast for Thursday
26 min ago