SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) -- There is more trouble for San Francisco's embattled crime lab. Specifically, how prosecutors handled the problems. On Thursday, a judge issued a scathing ruling accusing the district attorney of violating suspects' constitutional rights. That decision could affect hundreds of cases.
The district attorney's office says it has concerns about the judge's legal analysis and will address those through court motions. San Francisco public defender Jeff Adachi says the ruling should compel prosecutors to turn over information he has requested and is still waiting for.
"This is about the integrity of our justice system," says Adachi.
He calls the court ruling huge. It blasts District Attorney Kamala Harris and her office for failing to turn over damaging evidence about Debbie Madden.
Madden is the retired police drug lab technician, who used to testify against drug suspects and is now accused of skimming cocaine from the lab. She was convicted of domestic violence back in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that kind of information must be given to the defense.
"If you were accused and a witness testified against you and you weren't told the truth about that witness' background, how might that affect the verdict in your case? How might that affect your sentence?" asks Adachi.
In her ruling Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo says the district attorney's "failure to produce information actually in its possession regarding Madden and the Crime Lab is a violation of the defendants' constitutional rights."
However, the judge declined to toss out 60 cases saying dismissal is a remedy of last resort. The district attorney's office calls that a victory.
"At the end of the day, the bottom line is the judge did not dismiss any of the cases and that's exactly what we as the DA's office hoped for," says district attorney spokesperson Erica Derryck.
But according to ABC7 legal analyst Dean Johnson, this is a wake-up call for district attorneys throughout the state.
"It's now up to prosecutor to go to the police, to go through their personnel files, and to find out what might be in there that would be potentially helpful for the defense. It's in some way a revolution in the criminal justice system if this ruling is upheld," says Johnson.
Johnson says many district attorneys felt state law allowed them to protect the privacy of police and others who work in law enforcement. This judge has clearly said no and the public defender now wants information on dozens of San Francisco police officers he says have criminal records.
crime lab scandal, san francisco news, carolyn tyler
- Boy drowns after falling into canal in Antioch
- Search on for man who went missing after B2B race
- Scouts honor veterans at annual Memorial Day event
- Hundreds of food workers strike at AT&T Park in SF
- Angel Pagan wins it for SF Giants with inside-the-park HR
- Josh Donaldson, A's power past Astros 11-5
- Castillo scores as FC Dallas tops Earthquakes 1-0
- Wildfire near Interstate 580 in Livermore now contained
- San Antonio flooding kills one; 200-plus rescued
- San Francisco man with brain injury missing
- Millions march against Monsanto in over 400 cities
- abcnews: How to stay safe at amusement parks
- roundup: Machete murder; PG&E fights fine
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Sunday
-
Most Popular
-
Most Viewed StoriesMost Viewed VideoMost Viewed Photos
- abc7news.com home
- Site Map
- RSS
- Advertise with Us
- Contact Us
- Online Public Inspection File
- Technical Help
- ABC.com
- ABCNews.com
- Privacy Policy
- Interest-Based Ads
- Safety Information for this site
- Terms of Use
- Copyright ©2013 ABC Inc., KGO-TV San Francisco, CA. All Rights Reserved.





