Medi-Cal fight winds up in US Supreme Court
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KGO) -- The U.S Supreme Court is taking up a case that arose from the state budget crisis, over medical care for the poor. The state cut the money it pays to doctors for Medi-Cal patients. Those patients are claiming they don't have equal access to health care now.
The case pits cash-strapped California against low-income patients who are demanding guaranteed medical care. At issue is if a state can cut the rate it pays doctors under Medicaid, which is administered in California as the Medi-Cal program.
Family practitioner Dr. Gilbert Simon says no. The reimbursement rates are already so low he can barely stay open. An up to 10-percent cut would be devastating.
"We have to cut back. We have 12 clinics here. We have to eliminate clinics that are in most difficulty and reduce our staffing," said Simon.
The state of California argues doctors and low-income patients don't have the right to sue because the statute that created Medicaid doesn't list them.
"It doesn't say anything about whether or not these people who are suing are allowed to come into court and sue," said Prof. Leslie Gielow Jacobs from the University of the Pacific's McGeorge School of Law.
The California Department of Health Care Services also notes the Medicaid law fails to dictate a minimum dollar amount that patients must receive in benefits. It only spells out that the funding needs to be "sufficient" -- a test the state believes it has met.
"We made targeted reductions that we believe will allow us to continue providing meaningful healthcare services to our most needy individuals," said Norman Williams from the California Healthcare Services Department.
But for the 7.5 million Medi-Cal patients like Patricia Ondo, cutting payments could mean more and more doctors refusing to see them, creating a wider gap between the quality of healthcare for those with private insurance and those on public assistance.
"That's not equal and you're supposed to be equal. The United States is about being equal to one another. It's not about whether you can afford to be equal to one another," said Ondo.
A ruling could take several months. The 10-percent cut has been on hold since 2008. At stake is over a $1 billion in savings to the state budget. The Obama administration is siding with California on this one.
health care, sacramento, u.s. supreme court, politics, nannette miranda
- San Leandro police search for missing 10-year-old boy 40 min ago
- Mold forces firefighters to evacuate TI firehouse
- UC system issues new policy to handle sexual assaults
- Husband arrested in cold case murder of SJ woman
- Malaysia loses contact with plane carrying 239 23 min ago
- Cyberbullying bill responds to Audrie Pott's suicide
- Salesforce celebrates birthday with fundraiser party
- Oakland school locked down after report of assault
- Little girl donates hair to cancer patients
- Three-year-old boy thrown from fire in Hayward
- Homeowners blame Caltrain for rising flood insurance
- Special ed cheerleading squad thrills Livermore HS
- Wheel of Fortune is in Northern California! 27 min ago
- roundup: Embassy Suites body; SJ home fire