Lawmaker wants CPUC to reject PG&E plan
Assm. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, is urging the California Public Utilities Commission to reject a $2.2 billion plan by PG&E to modernize its pipelines.
Hill says PG&E's proposal would charge ratepayers up to 95 percent of the cost to replace aging pipelines. That means the utility company would profit from the upgrade.
"The PUC should not allow PG&E to force its customers to pick up the tab for work resulting from decades of neglect," Hill said.
PG&E admits ratepayers would pay close to 85 percent of the costs, but the utility says shareholders already paid $1.5 billion in costs related to the San Bruno pipeline explosion in 2010.
"What we're asking ratepayers here is to pay about $2 extra per month per residential customer per our PCEP plan and that plan will allow us to have the safest and most reliable system," PG&E spokesperson Brittany Chord said.
Hill is also promoting a bill that would prohibit PG&E from using ratepayer funds to pay for executive bonuses.
PG&E, california public utilities commission, california news
- Officials investigating acid spill at Tesoro refinery
- Family mourns young woman killed by tree
- Wounded police officer back in surgery
- Conn. shooter's dad: 'You can't get any more evil'
- Fitbit users still looking for answers on Force rashes
- 5-year-old boy, babysitter struck by car in crosswalk
- Petaluma foster home in danger of closing
- Stars raise money for SF children's hospital
- Man gets prison time in laser-pointer case
- Bill introduced to have utilities develop security plan
- Petaluma police searching for suspected drive-thru thief
- abcnews: 'The Bachelor' Finale Full Recap
- weather: Bay Area weather forecast for Tuesday
- roundup: Tesoro chemical spill; SOMA fire