Study: Smoker's lung transplant better than no lung
May 30, 2012 (WLS) -- A new study could change the outcome for some lung transplant recipients.
Researchers agree it's not the ideal situation, but they say people in need of a lung transplant are better off getting the donated lung of a smoker than getting no lung at all.
The study published in the medical journal Lancet shows recipients live a little longer, but not as long as someone with a non-smoker lung.
Researchers looked at 1,295 lung transplants. Nearly a third used lungs from donors who smoked.
Recipients of such lungs had worse three-year survival after transplantation than did those who received lungs from donors who had not smoked. The study also showed that patients receiving lungs from donors who smoked had a lower risk of death than those who remained on the waiting list.
- Oklahoma tornado in Moore kills dozens 1 min ago
- Detroit Red Wings beat Chicago Blackhawks 3-1
- I-Team: Expanded gambling in Illinois
- 1st weekday of Red Line Reconstruction
- Photos: Tornadoes hit Oklahoma, Kansas
- Shooting outside Planned Parenthood in Merrillville, Indiana
- 'Pollen tsunami' in Chicago, allergist says
- Governor, Mayor in high-stakes game of Chicago hold 'em
- 87-year-old accusing Trump says, 'Somebody had to stand up to...
- Photos: Milwaukee Pug Fest 2013
- abcnews: 200-Lbs. Bear Pulled From Colorado Springs...