HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - September 27, 2006 -- The man who succeeded in having the Pennsylvania Supreme Court declare lawmakers' midterm pay raises unconstitutional is asking the high court to rethink portions of its landmark ruling.
Gene Stilp filed a motion for reconsideration today that argues the high court lacks sufficient grounds to allow legislators to keep the money they have already collected in the form of "unvouchered expenses."
The Supreme Court on September 14th issued a 5-to-1 ruling that restored pay raises for about a thousand judges, including themselves, based on a state constitutional provision that generally prevents judges' pay from being lowered.
Stilp is also asking the court to reconsider its determination that upheld legislative methods to pass the July 2005 pay-raise law.
He wants the Supreme Court to clarify how state judges' compensation will be linked in the future to federal judges' pay.
Sponsored Content
- Photos: AccuWeather maps: Snow Round 2
- Snow is moving in.
- New snow emergencies declared
- Community and gov't cancellations for Wed.
- Pennsylvania braces for 2nd winter blast in days
- State of emergency for 7 NJ counties
- Some Del. residents still without power
- Video: Wed. @ 11: Giving hope to autistic children
- Former cop Tepper surrenders to police
- CONTACT ACTION NEWS
-
Most Popular
-
Most Viewed StoriesMost Viewed VideoMost Viewed Photos
6ABC Everywhere
Wireless
Breaking news as it happens. Sign up now!
Visit our mobile site at 6abctogo.com.
Get our iPhone application.
Newsletters, Alerts, and RSS
Sign up for our newsletters to get news, weather and other alerts via email.
Get breaking news alerts on your desktop
With our RSS feeds, get real-time updates of 6abc.com using your favorite news reader.
Follow us on Twitter!
Blog
Contests, Promotions, and Registration
Check out our contests and promotions. There are always great opportunities to win!
Become a member to enter contests, comment on stories, receive newsletters, and more!





